Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you actually want me to sell you on it, here goes:
You build spaceships. In space. With big pew pew lasers and energy/thermal management and everything. Now, building a spaceship isn't the end, but the beginning.
...I use VFE-Vikings,and the Crypto Armour completely slipped my mind. I'll look into it.
Looking at the mod,there's just way too many suits there,on top of the HazOp suit already providing Toxic Sensitivity Reduction. Sorry to say,but I don't see myself using Spartan Foundry,simply because it adds way too many statistically-similar suits of armour.
SoS2 seems to be a near-constant subject of discussion on the RimWorld Discord. Next colony I roll,I'll look into it. But at first blush,EVA suits are,by every definition,sealed up tight with their own life support systems,and very heavily shielded against radiation to boot. If they don't have Toxic Sensitivity Reduction as you say,then that's just laziness on the part of the mod dev.
https://steamproxy-script.pipiskins.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=725947920
The armor in that mod, despite being described as Marine Armor, has protection comparable to Cataphract Armor (120/50/150, vs. Cataphract 120/50/60), so I gave it the 50% resistance.
In addition, I've noticed that in couple of your patch definitions, you have an extra trailing slash after ThingDef and before the name specification, which will break that patch if that section is hit under the conditionals (I spent a fair amount of time this afternoon debugging exactly that issue when I copied one of your patch files to make mine above). In the Royalty patch file, the second and third xpath for the Locust Armor:
Similarly for the third xpath for the Prestige Recon Armor:
Both should use `/Defs/ThingDef[defName =` instead of /Defs/ThingDef/[defName =`
A files search for that pattern shows only those three instances, though, so fortunately it's not a widespread issue (and those would only be hit if the armor in question was given an `equippedStatOffsets` stat by another patch, or a vanilla change, first).
That said, I really like your conditional patching style.