Store Page
STAR WARS™ Empire at War: Gold Pack
All Discussions Screenshots Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

STAR WARS™ Empire at War: Gold Pack

Store Page
STAR WARS™ Empire at War: Gold Pack >  Workshop > STEINER MODDING GROUP OFFICIAL's Workshop > Awakening of the Clone Wars > Discussions
Awakening of the Clone Wars
Description Discussions60 Comments1319 Change Notes
Kurfürst 13 Jul @ 5:17pm
CIS Navy needs more powerful ships
It ist fine for the Republic to have powerfull ships, like the valliant, but in this case the CIS also need more counterparts, for example heavier Versions of the Providence and Bulwarks and Dreadnought-Versions of the Providence and the Recusant... Or to give all Ships of the CIS Weapons-upgrades as a Counterbalance.
< >
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
molchåmor 15 Jul @ 4:40pm 
Nah. Try playing republic against CIS and I guarantee you that you will change your opinion.

AI CIS absolutely slaughters republic unless the latter fields alot of command venators.
Last edited by molchåmor; 15 Jul @ 4:40pm
#1
Kurfürst 15 Jul @ 5:37pm 
Yes i bet at a player Perspective you would be right, but lore-wise the Cis had Dreadnought-versions and a better Providence- than displayed...
#2
molchåmor 16 Jul @ 5:14am 
I believe they said they lack models for some of these ships, maybe in the future we will see them and also bigger ships on the republic side like the Praetor. In any case, this is a game and balance is more important than anything or it would be unplayable. And both the playstyle needed to win and the current balance has been a bit challenged for this mod, not sure anyone is really happy with the way it is now, so making sure not making it worse by adding new ships is important also.

Last edited by molchåmor; 16 Jul @ 5:29am
#3
General Brooks  [developer] 17 Jul @ 8:14am 
The CIS is plenty strong enough in space as it is, but they are going to get a nice new space unit next patch which I think you'll be happy with.
#4
Kurfürst 17 Jul @ 8:15am 
Well thats great, i´m looking foreward to this:)
#5
< >
Showing 1-5 of 5 comments
Per page: 1530 50