Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, doing this obviously necessitates introduction of a shortcut for traffic heading to the 1st exit. (otherwise you have vehicles rapidly cutting their way through every lane of the roundabout)
Once you have such a shortcut, the roundabout's function is moot, as its only carrying traffic for the 3rd exit (and 4th exit u-turn).
To cut a long story short, the logical conclusion of making the aforementioned optimisations was this:
http://steamproxy-script.pipiskins.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=410400791
I've yet to test how much load it can carry (some of the slip lanes are a little sharp), but at a theoretical level it seems like the optimal solution for merging 2 equally balanced highways.
Now as there are 22000 citizens, there is so much traffic, that its getting congested because of cars trying to switch lanes. Time for another entrance into the district I guess.
Theory being:
- it'd minimize weaving (traffic joining the roundabout having to filter into traffic that's about to leave the roundabout)
- it'd encourage the lane pathing to make fuller use of all 3 lanes of the roundabout.